tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post8435739581344973131..comments2023-04-03T11:07:52.893+03:00Comments on Blogu' lu' Peşte: Violarea unei prepoziţiiLiviu Stanciuhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00131665493529026742noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-40012457896026358942010-02-10T10:29:15.834+02:002010-02-10T10:29:15.834+02:00.....se pare ca era rau deloc cand la scoala se fa........se pare ca era rau deloc cand la scoala se facea analiza gramaticala!! :))))Iuliahttp://www.iuliastroe.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-42879000049268786282010-02-07T13:08:33.975+02:002010-02-07T13:08:33.975+02:00nu cred ca are neaparat o denumire in gramatica ac...nu cred ca are neaparat o denumire in gramatica academica. e mai degraba de la conjugarea verbului pt pers a 3 sg/pl: el/ea/ei ar manca..dar totusi daca descoperi let me know:):*cretztembelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15792712607848899799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-25681517335030648952010-02-07T01:00:41.417+02:002010-02-07T01:00:41.417+02:00Stiu ce face, ca de-aia e pusa cratima acolo :)......Stiu ce face, ca de-aia e pusa cratima acolo :)... Cum se cheama, nu mai stiu. I-am zis articol, ca mi-era cel mai la indemana. Ca "este de la auxiliarul "a avea" sunt de acord, dar cum se cheama el, saracu` ?:)... O s-o intreb maine pe mama, ca e profesoara de romana, sau poate imi spui tu azi :)...Liviu Stanciuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00131665493529026742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-5959050475031048182010-02-07T00:39:53.415+02:002010-02-07T00:39:53.415+02:00oricum foarte adevaratoricum foarte adevaratcretztembelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15792712607848899799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-46127607028411908202010-02-07T00:38:11.839+02:002010-02-07T00:38:11.839+02:00ar acela este de la auxiliarul "a avea" ...ar acela este de la auxiliarul "a avea" care ajuta la formarea conditionalului optativ.cel putin asa sunt eu cultivata:))nu exista articolul "Ar":))cretztembelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15792712607848899799noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-23751552641068255082010-01-29T23:52:44.707+02:002010-01-29T23:52:44.707+02:00E bine ca asti dastept... :)E bine ca asti dastept... :)Elahttp://www.elenavoineag.ronoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-13318895288555008952010-01-29T23:33:10.987+02:002010-01-29T23:33:10.987+02:00aaaa, da:)))...credeam ca vrei sa contesti o crati...aaaa, da:)))...credeam ca vrei sa contesti o cratima de-acolo, abia acum mi-am dat seama ca le-am numarat eu gresit... Am umarat cele trei cuvinte, nu cele doua cratime :))Liviu Stanciuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00131665493529026742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-22594517994719258682010-01-29T23:31:46.522+02:002010-01-29T23:31:46.522+02:00Sta-le-ar, compus din "a sta", lor = &qu...Sta-le-ar, compus din "a sta", lor = "le", si nu mai stiu cum se cheama articolul asta, ar, de la "ar face, ar drege" - "ar sta lor in gat" :)... ia scrie-l cu doua cratime, sa vezi ce-ti iese :DLiviu Stanciuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00131665493529026742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7291149371373746753.post-37654216093232455042010-01-29T22:18:16.058+02:002010-01-29T22:18:16.058+02:00M-a uns pe suflet abordarea ta, drept urmare simt ...M-a uns pe suflet abordarea ta, drept urmare simt nevoia sa-ti fac o invitatie - ce-ai zice de un blog tematic pentru culturalizarea gramaticala a romanilor? (poate mai invatam si noi una-alta cu ocazia asta.. :) )<br />Ah...si ca sa nu-mi dezmint carcoteala si perfectionismul - "sta-le-ar" are doua cratime, nu trei.. :)Elenahttp://www.elenamarineci.ronoreply@blogger.com